Data entry menu Add ref Edit ref Switch ref Add sample Edit sample Add/edit register
Lambir Hills National Park (new fallow mammals)
edit this sample – create a copied sample – enter a new sample – edit the register
Basic information
Sample name: Lambir Hills National Park (new fallow mammals)

Reference: M. Nakagawa, H. Miguchi, and T. Nakashizuka. 2006. The effects of various forest uses on small mammal communities in Sarawak, Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 231:55-62 [ER 940]
Geography
Country: Malaysia

State: Sarawak


Coordinate: 4° 2' N, 114° 5' E
Coordinate basis: stated in text

Geography comments: coordinate stated in text as 4° 2' N, 113° 5' E; this apparently means 4° 2' N, 114° 5' E

Environment
Habitat: tropical/subtropical moist broadleaf forest

Altered habitat: cropland

Protection: national/state park

Substrate: ground surface

MAT: 27.0

MAP: 2700.0

Habitat comments: "originally primary forests, mainly dominated by Dryobalanops aromatica (Dipterocarpaceae)" but now "new fallow (1 year after abandonment)" after "slash-and-burn agriculture," covered with grasses that are "mixed with small Macaranga and Artocarpus trees"
MAP reported in text; MAT based on sample 699

Methods
Life forms: rodents,other small mammals

Sites: 2

Site area: 0.4

Sampling methods: quadrat,baited,cage traps

Sample size: 50 individuals

Days: 15

Net or trap nights: 846

Sampling comments: there were "two study plots... (10 m x 200 m)" that were "baited with banana and sweet potato" and "Small mammals were live-trapped for five consecutive days and nights using wire-mesh live cage traps" per trapping series and there were "three trapping series"

Metadata
Sample number: 1419

Contributor: John Alroy

Enterer: John Alroy

Created: 2015-02-27 20:41:04

Modified: 2021-07-11 05:30:14

Abundance distribution
10 species
1 singleton
total count 50
extrapolated richness: 15.5
Fisher's α: 3.759
geometric series k: 0.7661
Hurlbert's PIE: 0.8465
Shannon's H: 2.0535
Good's u: 0.9822
Each square represents a species. Square sizes are proportional to counts.
Register
Current reference: Huckleberry et al. 2001 (ER 3215)